{"content_id":"2041919","content_type":"product"}
LABO-H Chilsung Collaboration Hair Loss Symptom Relief Cider Shampoo
Chilsung Collaboration Hair Loss Symptom Relief Cider Shampoo
2.437
Retail Price₩24,000
Size400mL ≈ 13.53 fl. oz.
Ranking
TikTok Reviews
AI-Analyzed Reviews
Pros
- Pleasant Scent2
- Scent Lasts Long1
- Provides Cooling Effect1
- Moisturizing1
- Has Anti-Hair Loss Effect1
- Improves Hair Texture1
Cons
- Doesn't Foam Up4
- Doesn't Cleanse Well2
- Doesn't Remove Impurities1
- Stiff1
7
Reviews
2.43
5
4
3
3
2
3
1
Korean Reviews
- tk******Combination SkinSensitive SkinSebum/BlackheadsInner DrynessEnlarged PoresSep 14, 2023
I bought this at Olive Young during the hot summer, and I've almost used it all up now. It's so refreshingly cool that it almost gives me a brain freeze! Even after using a pre-shampoo, it doesn't lather well, and after cleansing, it leaves my hair feeling not quite clean. - vg****Oily SkinSensitive SkinAcne SkinAtopic SkinAug 15, 2023
Conclusion: If you're dealing with oily scalp, excess sebum, dandruff, scalp odor, or sensitivity, I wouldn't recommend this product. My Scalp Type: Extremely sensitive, very oily with intense scalp odor, requiring twice-daily shampooing. As someone with ultra-sensitive skin, I meticulously check the ingredients of everything I use. Both my skin and scalp produce excessive oil, so thorough cleansing is crucial to prevent clogged pores and scalp blemishes. That's why I shampoo twice a day. Background: Most commercial shampoos cause severe irritation for me, resulting in painful, red, pustular acne where my hair touches my neck, face, and scalp. I've relied on fragrance-free baby shampoos to avoid irritating ingredients. The downside? Baby shampoos lack cleansing power and lasting effects. Even shampooing twice daily doesn't control my oily scalp, and without fragrance, the scalp odor persists. I've been a shampoo nomad for decades. Product Review: 1. Cleansing Effectiveness: ❤️❤️ I tried this after issues with centella-containing products and hair loss. Comparing it to Labo-H for oily, flaky scalps: both cleanse well initially, leaving no itchiness. However, this one causes intense itching, dandruff, and odor after 5-6 hours. I'd never have tried it if the Labo-H didn't contain centella. 2. Scent: ❤ I'm fragrance-sensitive and avoid perfumes. Despite containing fragrance, I gave it a try. The scent is reminiscent of flat, lukewarm soda left out for hours. It's faint post-wash and fades quickly. While it masks scalp odor initially, the effect is short-lived. Unsurprisingly, the fragrance caused major blemishes. 3. Lather and Texture: ❤️❤️ The shampoo has a slippery texture. It doesn't lather excessively, but it's satisfactory for double-washing. Though marketed as cooling, I didn't notice any scalp-cooling effect. 4. Ingredients: ❤️ Great that it's centella-free, but why include fragrance? And not even a pleasant one. The fragrance likely triggered my skin eruption. 5. Effectiveness: ❤️ After finishing a bottle, I saw zero improvement in hair loss. With the Labo-H oily scalp formula, I noticed less shedding, but this product seemed to increase hair loss due to scalp irritation. Try a different Labo-H line. If centella works for you and you have an oily scalp, I'd recommend their oily, flaky scalp formula.
Ingredients
What's inside
All Ingredients
3120 Ingredients to Avoid
2
Potential Allergen
0
Ingredient Functions
Ingredient Information:
Each ingredient is selected for its specific purpose, such as improving skin hydration or brightening. However, the inclusion of these ingredients does not guarantee the overall effectiveness of the final product. Simply using these ingredients does not ensure the product will deliver the claimed benefits.
Ingredients by Skin Type
Oily Skin
1
0
Dry Skin
3
1
Sensitive Skin
0
1
- •We recommend reviewing the full ingredient list from the manufacturer/brand before purchasing.
- •Unauthorized use of Hwahae’s content for commercial purposes may result in legal action.
- •The ingredient ratios are provided by the brand, which is fully responsible for their accuracy.